Ownership and corporate records
Review incorporation, capital and ownership records, governance approvals, signing authority and relevant historical changes. Identify inconsistencies that require supporting evidence.
Scope legal due diligence for a Vietnam transaction: ownership, licences, contracts, employment and disputes, with a prioritised findings report.
Legal due diligence examines a defined set of records against a proposed transaction. Its purpose is to identify legal issues that may affect structure, price negotiations, contractual protection, closing conditions or the decision to proceed. It is a scoped review, rather than a certification that a business has no liabilities.
Duong Tri Law agrees the target entities, review period, materiality, access arrangements and reporting format before starting. A buyer-side review, vendor preparation and a focused red-flag review have different objectives and should not be treated as interchangeable.
Review incorporation, capital and ownership records, governance approvals, signing authority and relevant historical changes. Identify inconsistencies that require supporting evidence.
Compare the target’s actual activities with the registrations and permissions supplied. Assess renewal, change-of-control or transfer questions within the agreed scope.
Review selected material agreements for restrictions, termination rights, consents, security interests and obligations that may affect the transaction.
Review the agreed employment records, key personnel arrangements and disclosed litigation or claims. Personal data access should be limited to what the review needs.
Assess supplied lease and property-use records and their relevance to the deal. Surveying, title verification beyond agreed searches and technical inspections need separate scope.
Review selected ownership, licensing and data-related arrangements relevant to the target’s operations. Technical security testing and a full privacy audit are separate exercises.
The agreed output may be a concise red-flag memorandum or a fuller legal due diligence report. Each material finding should explain the document or fact supporting it, the uncertainty, its possible transaction effect and the recommended next action.
Risk labels help prioritise attention; they do not quantify financial exposure unless that assessment is separately supported. The report is addressed to the agreed client, with reliance and circulation terms set in the engagement.
Use an agreed secure channel for the data room. Do not send employee files or other sensitive records in an initial enquiry.
Agree entities, materiality, reporting format, review period and the information request list.
Review documents, record evidence and seek clarification where records conflict or are incomplete.
Separate confirmed findings, open questions and exclusions; explain their relevance to the proposed transaction.
Discuss the report and, if commissioned, carry findings into transaction documents or the closing checklist.
Timing depends on the number of entities, the volume and quality of records, languages, access and the speed of responses. A deadline can be agreed only against those dependencies. Service fees, translation, searches and specialist costs should be identified separately.
A document review cannot reveal every undisclosed fact. Financial audit, tax computations, valuation, physical inspection, technical testing and ongoing monitoring are outside scope unless expressly included. Material new information after the review date may require an update.
No. It focuses on agreed priority issues. The transaction’s value, complexity and risk tolerance determine whether a fuller review or additional specialist work is appropriate.
No. It explains findings within the agreed perimeter and evidence available. Missing information and limitations remain visible in the report.
The client decides how to proceed. Further work may include remediation, negotiations, transaction drafting, approval analysis or a closing checklist, each within an agreed mandate.
Return to M&A & transactions to plan the wider deal. Where the structure involves a share acquisition, review the registration workstream separately from diligence.