Skip to content
Duong Tri Law
Request Advice

Legal due diligence in Vietnam

Scope legal due diligence for a Vietnam transaction: ownership, licences, contracts, employment and disputes, with a prioritised findings report.

Discuss your requirements

Understand the target before you commit

Legal due diligence examines a defined set of records against a proposed transaction. Its purpose is to identify legal issues that may affect structure, price negotiations, contractual protection, closing conditions or the decision to proceed. It is a scoped review, rather than a certification that a business has no liabilities.

Duong Tri Law agrees the target entities, review period, materiality, access arrangements and reporting format before starting. A buyer-side review, vendor preparation and a focused red-flag review have different objectives and should not be treated as interchangeable.

Agree the review perimeter

Ownership and corporate records

Review incorporation, capital and ownership records, governance approvals, signing authority and relevant historical changes. Identify inconsistencies that require supporting evidence.

Activities, projects and licences

Compare the target’s actual activities with the registrations and permissions supplied. Assess renewal, change-of-control or transfer questions within the agreed scope.

Contracts and financing

Review selected material agreements for restrictions, termination rights, consents, security interests and obligations that may affect the transaction.

Employment and disputes

Review the agreed employment records, key personnel arrangements and disclosed litigation or claims. Personal data access should be limited to what the review needs.

Premises and operational rights

Assess supplied lease and property-use records and their relevance to the deal. Surveying, title verification beyond agreed searches and technical inspections need separate scope.

IP, technology and data

Review selected ownership, licensing and data-related arrangements relevant to the target’s operations. Technical security testing and a full privacy audit are separate exercises.

A report that supports decisions

The agreed output may be a concise red-flag memorandum or a fuller legal due diligence report. Each material finding should explain the document or fact supporting it, the uncertainty, its possible transaction effect and the recommended next action.

  • Executive issues list, organised by priority and transaction relevance.
  • Scope, review period, materials examined, assumptions and exclusions.
  • Outstanding document requests and questions requiring target confirmation.
  • Recommended remediation, contractual protection or closing evidence.
  • A follow-up discussion to clarify findings and allocate next actions.

Risk labels help prioritise attention; they do not quantify financial exposure unless that assessment is separately supported. The report is addressed to the agreed client, with reliance and circulation terms set in the engagement.

What to provide at the outset

  • Transaction outline, target entities, structure chart and intended timetable.
  • Data-room index, access permissions and the proposed confidentiality arrangements.
  • Corporate and ownership records, licences, key contracts and financing information.
  • Known issues, disputes and areas the commercial team considers material.
  • The scope of parallel tax, financial, technical or environmental reviews.

Use an agreed secure channel for the data room. Do not send employee files or other sensitive records in an initial enquiry.

From initial review to agreed next steps

  1. Set scope and access

    Agree entities, materiality, reporting format, review period and the information request list.

  2. Examine records and ask questions

    Review documents, record evidence and seek clarification where records conflict or are incomplete.

  3. Report implications

    Separate confirmed findings, open questions and exclusions; explain their relevance to the proposed transaction.

  4. Support the next decision

    Discuss the report and, if commissioned, carry findings into transaction documents or the closing checklist.

Timing, fees and limitations

Timing depends on the number of entities, the volume and quality of records, languages, access and the speed of responses. A deadline can be agreed only against those dependencies. Service fees, translation, searches and specialist costs should be identified separately.

A document review cannot reveal every undisclosed fact. Financial audit, tax computations, valuation, physical inspection, technical testing and ongoing monitoring are outside scope unless expressly included. Material new information after the review date may require an update.

Questions before you proceed

Is a red-flag review enough for every transaction?

No. It focuses on agreed priority issues. The transaction’s value, complexity and risk tolerance determine whether a fuller review or additional specialist work is appropriate.

Will the report confirm there are no legal risks?

No. It explains findings within the agreed perimeter and evidence available. Missing information and limitations remain visible in the report.

What happens after the report?

The client decides how to proceed. Further work may include remediation, negotiations, transaction drafting, approval analysis or a closing checklist, each within an agreed mandate.

Connect the findings to the deal

Return to M&A & transactions to plan the wider deal. Where the structure involves a share acquisition, review the registration workstream separately from diligence.

Duong Tri Law

Tell us what you need

Tell us about your business, the matter and any deadline. We will discuss the scope of assistance before work begins.

Contact Duong Tri Law (EN)